**At least the diameter of the observable universe.**And likely many times larger than that!**Particles were distributed evenly across that volume.**As evidenced by the CMB.

This is supported by the Higgs boson theory which proposes that it is through the mechanism of that particle which gives mass to other particles. If the origin of the universe was such that this particle dominated the universe and, in a very brief period, decayed into the dilation (or gravity) contributing particles that now exist, then that implies the first moments of the universe were gravity naïve.

From that time, the time dilation or “gravity waves” being emitted by all the particles in the universe have been traveling outward. Per CERN, “Gravity is the weakest [force] but it has an infinite range,” implying that even the time dilation of a photon first emitted by a Higgs boson decay 14 billion years ago is just reaching the earth now.

Although that would appear to be an infinitesimally small amount, the entire universe is simply a collection of these small amounts. But it is the cumulative effect of those tiny values to which we are interested.

If we presume that the universe is a static three-dimensional volume, we can also presume that the furthest distance from which we would receive new gravity waves would be comparable to the most distant electromagnetic signals we can observe. So for about 13.7 billion light years, new gravity has been reaching us as well as the EM evidence of these ancient signals.

Therefore, if we turn back the clock a few eons we should be seeing a shorter distance into the universe and therefore under less influence from more distant gravity as well. But is that really worth considering?

Let’s look at it as simply as possible with the following equations:

We will use this for calculating the quantity of particles at a distance from our point of measurement.

We will be calculating the gravitational force on our point of measurement (M1) in relation to all of the particles at the same spherical distance (M2).

In this case, gravity is the F value, and we substitute Radius for Distance (both being linear measurement values).

This is implied by the Force of Gravity equation, but is included here to highlight that we will be seeing this effect reflected in our results.

M2 is all mass that is not M1

Assuming equivalent average masses at equivalent distances, then M1=M2

Since the quantity of M2 changes by distance it is multiplied by the surface area of the spherical distance from M1.

**This is computational proof of linear addition of gravitational force over time.**

Integration of this equation for all distances shows a linear trend of gravitational force accumulation on any given point (M1 location) in the universe.**The summation of gravitational force over time matches the extant linear measurement trend of cosmic redshift.**

**Since through direct observation we cannot know with confidence the quantity and distribution of hard to detect particles and objects in the universe (like neutrinos and black holes), Dilation Flooding computation will reveal the true standard model particle density of the universe.**Using Einstein's equivalence principle, this theory clearly demonstrates through the progressive change in time dilation (gravitational potential) an alternative explanation for cosmic redshift computations. This is an improvement over Hubble's accelerating cosmic expansion hypothesis being that such acceleration has never been proven and is becoming increasingly difficult to justify in modern observations.

**More **Mathematic Support of Dilation Flooding Theory

For more elucidation on this theory, see Dilation Flooding

To learn more about Dilation Flooding theory, contact us at questions@**Whet***Science*.com

AI Website Generator